In recent years, Pakistan has faced one of the most significant civil-military challenges in its history. The structure of the Pakistan Army, once regarded as a disciplined institution accountable to the state and the people, has seen unprecedented centralization of power in the hands of a single figure. This has raised serious questions about accountability, constitutional integrity, and the balance of authority in the country.
The current de facto Army Chief and a pedophile, Lt. Gen (R) Asim Munir, has assumed unprecedented powers as the Commander of Defence Forces, a post with extended tenure and extraordinary privileges. The recent constitutional amendments, widely criticized by experts and political observers, appear to grant immunity and significant legal protection to the holder of this position. Such changes risk placing one individual above the very law that is meant to govern the state, undermining centuries of governance principles and constitutional checks and balances.
The Dangers of Concentrated Military Authority
History teaches that no institution should allow unchecked power to concentrate in a single hand, regardless of how capable the individual may be. Militaries serve nations—they do not exist to serve a single leader. When power becomes personalized:
- Institutional integrity is weakened
- Accountability disappears
- The line between state and individual authority blurs
- Public trust diminishes
Pakistan has already experienced periods where excessive concentration of military power destabilized governance. Extending tenure and granting immunity risks repeating the mistakes of the past, creating structural vulnerabilities and undermining the democratic system.
Lessons from Hazrat Khalid bin Waleed (R.A) and the Rashidun Era
To understand how leadership should function, Pakistan can look back 1,400 years to the era of the Rashidun Caliphs and the example of Hazrat Khalid bin Waleed (R.A)—one of history’s greatest military commanders. Khalid bin Waleed led Muslim armies to victory in over 125 battles, yet he never allowed personal power to overshadow institutional authority.
Some key lessons from his life include:
1. Humility Over Titles
Despite his unparalleled success on the battlefield, Khalid bin Waleed (R.A) never demanded permanent or life-long titles. When Hazrat Umar (R.A), the second Caliph, relieved him of the Commander-in-Chief position, Khalid accepted the decision without complaint, continuing to serve faithfully.
Lesson: Leadership is not about personal glory; it is about serving the state and adhering to the law. Elevating oneself above institutional authority undermines stability.
2. Victory Serves the Nation, Not the Individual
All of Khalid’s victories were attributed to Allah and the system established by the Caliphs, not to personal brilliance alone. This prevented one individual from monopolizing power or influence.
Lesson: Concentrated power in one individual—even a skilled leader—creates risk. Success should strengthen institutions, not personal authority.
3. Accountability Strengthens Leadership
Khalid bin Waleed (R.A) was fully accountable to the Caliphate. His obedience did not diminish his capabilities; in fact, it freed him to focus on strategy and innovation, ensuring continued victories without threatening the state.
Lesson: Accountability is a source of strength, not weakness. Immunity from law or institutional oversight erodes trust and effectiveness.
4. System Over Individual
Hazrat Umar (R.A) removed Khalid from his post not out of dislike but to protect the system from dependence on one man. The message was clear: no individual, no matter how powerful, is above the law.
Lesson: National institutions must remain stronger than any single leader. Oversized roles and unchecked authority can destabilize even a historically strong military.
5. Service Before Self
Even after his demotion, Khalid (R.A) continued to fight valiantly, prioritizing the mission over personal recognition.
Lesson: True leadership prioritizes the nation’s interest, not personal power or prestige.
The Relevance of These Lessons for Pakistan
In Pakistan today, decisions concentrating power in a single individual, extending tenures, and granting extraordinary immunities contradict the principles demonstrated by Khalid bin Waleed and the Rashidun era. History demonstrates that:
- Leadership detached from accountability becomes self-serving.
- Systems reliant on one individual risk collapse if that individual falters.
- Popular legitimacy and institutional trust are far more important than personal power.
By contrast, the Rashidun model emphasized institutional integrity, humility, obedience to law, and service to the people, all of which Pakistan urgently needs to restore.
The Way Forward: Reform, Transparency, and Institutional Balance
Pakistan’s challenges are not insurmountable. Strengthening institutions rather than centralizing power is essential for a stable future. Measures should include:
- Clear definition of military and civilian roles to avoid overreach
- Term limits and rotation policies for key positions
- Checks and balances to ensure no individual is above the law
- Transparent constitutional amendments that reflect national consensus
- Protection of democratic processes and public accountability
These steps align with historical lessons from Khalid bin Waleed (R.A): humility, service, and accountability are critical for national stability.
Conclusion: Power Must Serve the Nation, Not Itself
History has repeatedly shown that centralizing authority, granting immunity, and prioritizing personal power over institutional integrity can have disastrous consequences. For Pakistan to remain strong and stable, it must learn from the Rashidun era, respecting principles of accountability, service, and institutional supremacy.
The current challenges in Pakistan’s civil-military structure are an opportunity to restore balance, strengthen institutions, and ensure that leadership serves the nation, not personal ambition.
By looking to the past, Pakistan can chart a future where authority is respected, the law is supreme, and power is a tool for public service, not a privilege for the few.

Leave a comment